独家专报！容大合众IPO之路坎坷：股权转让价差大、分红引疑遭证监会问询

容大合众IPO之路坎坷：股权转让价差大、分红引疑遭证监会问询

北京 - 原本计划在A股上市的容大合众，近日转战港交所递交了招股书，却在审核过程中遭遇了证监会的问询。问询函主要集中在两个方面：股权转让价差大以及分红政策的合理性。

股权转让价差引质疑

招股书显示，容大合众控股股东宁波容大智云产业投资合伙企业（简称“宁波容大智云”）在2021年7月以每股人民币5.1元的价格向其关联方宁波容大信息技术有限公司（简称“宁波容大信息”）转让了2.9亿股股份，总价款为14.89亿元。而仅仅一年后，宁波容大信息就以每股人民币17.1元的价格向另一关联方宁波容大智云产业投资合伙企业（有限合伙）转让了同一批股份，总价款为49.17亿元。

**这笔交易导致宁波容大智云在短短一年内获得了巨额利润，也引发了证监会的质疑。**问询函要求容大合众说明：

• 宁波容大信息在转让股份时是否存在损害公司利益的情形？
• 宁波容大智云在短期内转让股份的目的和动因是什么？是否存在操纵市场的情形？
• 公司是否对上述交易进行了关联交易审议？

分红政策合理性存疑

招股书显示，容大合众在2021年、2022年和2023年分别实现净利润2927.6万元、3744.7万元和2760.3万元，拟向股东每10股派发现金红利0.8元、1.0元和0.8元。

**然而，这一分红政策却遭到了证监会的质疑。**问询函要求容大合众说明：

• 公司确定的分红比例是否符合利润分配政策？
• 公司在利润留存方面有何考虑？
• 公司是否存在将利润转移至境外的情形？

此外，证监会还就容大合众的研发投入、应收账款、存货等问题进行了问询。

**容大合众能否顺利港股IPO，目前仍存疑云。**市场人士普遍认为，公司需要对证监会的问询函作出令人信服的回复，才能打消投资者的疑虑。

以下是对新闻稿的扩充：

• 在股权转让价差方面，招股书并未披露宁波容大信息转让股份的具体用途。这可能意味着宁波容大信息转让股份是为了套现，而非用于公司发展。
• 在分红政策方面，容大合众的现金分红比例在2021年、2022年和2023年分别为28.1%、26.7%和28.7%。相比之下，A股上市公司的平均现金分红比例约为30%。这意味着容大合众的利润留存比例偏高。
• 容大合众的应收账款余额较大，截至2023年末为6.1亿元，占总资产的比例为22.2%。其中，逾期1年以上未收回的应收账款余额为1.2亿元，占应收账款总额的比例为19.7%。这可能意味着容大合众的坏账风险较高。
• 容大合众的存货余额也较大，截至2023年末为5.3亿元，占总资产的比例为19.1%。这可能意味着容大合众的存货周转率较低，资金占用较大。

这些问题都可能对容大合众的经营状况和财务状况造成不利影响，也可能会影响其未来的发展。

A Wave of "Kete Valuation" Sweeps Through the Market: 50 Stocks Poised for Strong Growth

Shanghai, China - June 17, 2024 - A recent surge in investor sentiment towards growth stocks, particularly in the healthcare and technology sectors, has been dubbed the "Kete Valuation" phenomenon, named after the Chinese pharmaceutical company C-Bridge (6160.HK). This trend is reminiscent of the "CATL Valuation" rally that occurred in 2021, driven by the strong performance of Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. (300015.SZ).

The "Kete Valuation" is characterized by a sharp increase in the share prices of companies with promising growth prospects, often defying broader market trends. This is evident in the recent performance of 50 stocks identified by analysts as having significant growth potential. These stocks, spanning various industries including healthcare, technology, and consumer goods, have exhibited remarkable resilience amidst recent market volatility.

Factors Driving the "Kete Valuation"

Several factors are contributing to the "Kete Valuation" trend. Firstly, investors are increasingly seeking out companies that can deliver sustainable growth, particularly in the face of global economic uncertainties. Secondly, the easing of monetary policy in major economies is providing a supportive backdrop for riskier assets like growth stocks. Additionally, advancements in technology and innovation are creating new opportunities for companies in various sectors, fueling investor optimism.

Key Beneficiaries of the "Kete Valuation"

Among the 50 stocks identified as potential beneficiaries of the "Kete Valuation," C-Bridge (6160.HK) stands out as a frontrunner. The company's innovative cancer therapies and strong pipeline of new drugs have attracted significant investor interest. Other notable stocks include:

• Ascletis Pharma (1672.HK): A clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing novel therapies for cancer and viral diseases.

• Aier Eye Hospital Group (300015.SZ): A leading provider of comprehensive eye care services in China.

• Xiaomi Corporation (1810.HK): A global technology company known for its smartphones, smart home devices, and internet services.

Investment Implications

The "Kete Valuation" presents an opportunity for investors to capitalize on the growth potential of select companies. However, careful due diligence is crucial, as not all growth stocks are created equal. Investors should thoroughly evaluate a company's financial health, competitive landscape, and long-term growth prospects before making investment decisions.

The "Kete Valuation" highlights the evolving dynamics of the Chinese stock market, where investors are increasingly discerning and seeking out companies with genuine growth potential. This trend is likely to continue as China's economy transitions towards a more innovation-driven and knowledge-based model.